Sensational Revelation Denis O'Brien and IBRC

DENIS O'BRIEN TELEPHONES SEAN QUINN ON BEHALF OF .............................................................................................

DENIS O'BRIEN,MIKE AYNSLEY, ALAN DUKES AND CO/IRISH GOV/ ALL THE SAME SOWS PIGS!

The Irish Gov. and the IBRC boys have been adamant that there is no cosy relationship between Denis O'Brien and themselves and that O'Brien was given no favourable treatment or terms.

 We beg to differ. There are reports in the market that O'Brien was acting on behalf of Aynsley, Dukes and Co when he rang Sean Quinn in Autumn 2012 to set up a meeting between the Quinns and IBRC with a view to a so called "settlement".

 The subsequent meeting was chaired by non other than "Independent Group of Newspapers" Chief Executive, Leslie Buckley. 

We must remind ourselves that Buckley and Derbhail Mac Donald work for Denis O'Brien. If Denis O'Brien was not on very close terms with Anysley and Co. how could he take it on himself to arrange a critical meeting with the Quinns on IBRC's behalf? 

Now we see why Alan Dukes was quaking in the oversized boots a few weeks ago when he let the cat out of the bag by mentioning A1 as a questionable partnership.

What is even more interesting is the timing. This meeting was arranged at around the same time that the Quinns were sent to jail and more importantly, the same time as Niall Mac Partland, (Sean Quinn's son-in-law) went before Justice Kelly in the High Court to say that the Quinn family were offering to do everything humanly possible to retrieve their own assets including travel to Russia etc. 

They offered to work WITH the bank to get the assets back. Surely, this would have been the best option for the taxpayers as it would have cost nothing while the proposed deal with A1 was offering the company an arm and a leg to retrieve the assets.

A1 had a "criminal" track record in the highest of Gov circles and indeed they make the mafia appear like poodles so why would the Irish Gov/IBRC sanction such a costly deal with such a company when there was a sound offer on the table from the owners of the assets to retrieve to assets with no cost to the taxpayer?

The plot thickened until we learned in the past 24 hours that the owner and founder of A1, a man called Mikail Fridman, appointed Denis O'Brien as director of his company.

 Yes, it is becoming all too clear. Was it Denis O'Brien who introduced A1 to Aynsley, Dukes and Co and were they out to make a killing from Quinn assets? 

Dont forget, they had to move fast as there was a sound offer on the table from the Quinn family to work WITH the bank to regain control of the assets. Why would the Gov sanction such an outrageous deal with a company of ill repute when there was an option to work with the owners of the assets to recoup the assets?

We in CIC have nothing personal against Denis O'Brien. We are merely pointing out that IBRC was not acting in the best interest of those who were paying their wages (taxpayers) and that they misled the Irish people about the true nature of their relationship with Denis O'Brien.

 How convenient it was for them to have a bed fellow who owned most of the Irish media when they had a scapegoat to vilify!

They used the media to portray themselves as transparent, honest (what a joke that has become) with no improper and "conflict of interest" close relationships with customers of IBRC.

 Now we find out that O'Brien was Director of the company that they sanctioned to retrieve Quinn assets for an astronomical "fee". This all makes the Mick Wallace NAMA controversy about the 7 million "fee" look insignificant.

This is the same Denis O'Brien who denied any improper relationship with Michael Lowry, who denied wrongdoing in the ESAT/Siteserv Deal, the same man who was handed Topaz and made a killing in questionable circumstances, the same man who was pictured with Enda Kenny at a high profile dinner abroad.

The findings of a tribunal dealing with the affair were very serious in relation to the integrity of O'Brien and speak for itself.

Aynsly, Dukes and Co claim on the one hand to have been acting in the best public interest "Dukes was a Public Interest Director but did not know the meaning of the word", and that they had no improper relationship with Denis O'Brien as he owed the bank (Irish people) an enormous sum of money, most of which was written off by the bank, while on the other hand O'Brien set up a meeting with the Quinn family for IBRC at the very time that there is a judicial record of the Quinns offering to work WITH the bank.

 It does not take a genius to figure out that they were all in bed together and were out to make a small fortune out of the Quinns while using O'Brien's influences and media to make the Quinns the "most hated family in Ireland" while all the time, making complete fools of the Irish people. 

The Quinns are now recognized as the greatest victims of this farce and the Irish People will get answers.